Loneliness, living alone tied to shorter lifespan
People with heart disease who live alone tend to die sooner than those sharing their home with others, a new study shows.
Although the reasons for the gap are still murky, lead researcher Dr. Deepak Bhatt said access to regular medicine might be involved.
“Patients living alone may have more difficulty getting their medications refilled and taking them regularly,” Bhatt told Reuters Health. “They also don’t have anyone at home to call the doctor’s office or emergency room if they are not looking well.”
Earlier research has yielded mixed conclusions, but studies have linked social isolation to everything from heart attacks to weakened immune systems.
Bhatt, of Harvard Medical School in Boston, and his colleagues focused specifically on people with known heart disease or at very high risk for it. They included more than 44,000 people, all of whom were 45 or older, from multiple countries across the globe.
Over the four years the study lasted, 7.7 percent of participants younger than 65 who lived on their own died, compared to just 5.7 percent of those who didn’t live alone.
The gap was smaller for people age 66 to 80, but it remained statistically reliable even after accounting for age, sex, employment, ethnicity and country. The living situation of those over 80, however, wasn’t tied to death rates.
Writing in the Archives of Internal Medicine, the researchers speculate that in people under 80, living alone could signal psychological and social problems like job strain or loneliness. In contrast, very old people who live on their own may be healthier and more independent than those who don’t.
Whatever the explanation, Bhatt said cardiologists should routinely ask their patients if they live alone.
“If the answer is yes, that might be a red flag and they should make sure the patients have a way to get their medicine regularly,” he said. Meanwhile, patients living solo should think twice before ignoring changes that might be a sign of health problems.
“Many times people just adapt to their circumstances,” he said. “Perhaps just lower your threshold a little bit and realize it’s better to call (the doctor) than not to call.”
But that might not be the whole story, he acknowledged.
“Other mechanisms by which living alone could increase cardiac risk have to do with possible social isolation and loneliness, and these are more challenging to fix,” Bhatt said.
Indeed, another report published along with Bhatt’s shows older people who felt lonely had more difficulty performing basic tasks of daily living and died younger than those who didn’t feel alone.
SOURCE: Archives of Internal Medicine, online June 18, 2012
###
Living Alone and Cardiovascular Risk in Outpatients at Risk of or With Atherothrombosis
Conclusions In an international outpatient population with atherothrombosis aged 45 years or older, living alone was associated with increased mortality among all but the most elderly patients, although this observation warrants confirmation.
###
The limitations of our study are worth noting and include bias and unmeasured confounding. As with any registry, volunteer bias may have influenced the type of patients recruited by physicians; however, the sampling from 44 countries constituting numerous ethnicities and cultures makes this threat less likely. Our exposure of interest, living alone, was dichotomized at one time point. Because we did not ascertain participant living status longitudinally, we cannot comment on whether the risk is dynamic over time. Furthermore, we did not collect information on other potential confounders, such as self-reported depressive symptoms, quality of life, psychological diagnoses, marital status, or type of dwelling. Finally, the lack of a significant effect of living alone among older participants after multivariate adjustment may be related to the low number of participants in this age group.
In conclusion, living alone was independently associated with an increased risk of mortality and CV death in an international cohort of stable middle-aged outpatients with or at risk of atherothrombosis. Younger individuals who live alone may have a less favorable course than all but the most elderly individuals following development of CV disease, and this observation warrants confirmation in further studies. Younger patients living alone after an atherothrombotic ischemic event may be an additional risk group on which to focus efforts to improve prognosis.
Jacob A. Udell, MD, MPH; Philippe Gabriel Steg, MD; Benjamin M. Scirica, MD, MPH; Sidney C. Smith, MD; E. Magnus Ohman, MD; Kim A. Eagle, MD; Shinya Goto, MD; Jang Ik Cho, MS; Deepak L. Bhatt, MD, MPH; for the REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry Investigators