The Breast Cancer Alternative Hypothesis
SUMMARY
In conclusion:
* During the last two decades, as a result of the use of systemic therapy in conjunction with breast-conservation surgery and radiation therapy, the incidence of locoregional recurrence has been reduced to a level where further reduction, a goal worthy of achieving, is likely to have little impact on survival.
* Despite the extensive information presented in this commentary, there is no new scientifically based evidence to justify replacing the current breast cancer hypothesis.
* It is likely that findings from research related to molecular biology and genetics will be the source of information that will result in a new, testable thesis that will eventually replace the alternative hypothesis and thus the paradigm that currently governs the treatment of breast cancer.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Conception and design: Bernard Fisher, Stewart J. Anderson
Manuscript writing: Bernard Fisher, Stewart J. Anderson
Final approval of manuscript: Bernard Fisher, Stewart J. Anderson
REFERENCES
- Rabinovitch R, Kavanagh B: Double helix of breast cancer therapy: Intertwining the Halsted and Fisher hypotheses. J Clin Oncol 27:2422–2423, 2009.
- Fisher B: Laboratory and clinical research in breast cancer: A personal adventure—The David A. Karnofsky Memorial Lecture. Cancer Res 40:3863–3874, 1980.
- Fisher B: From Halsted to prevention and beyond: Advances in the management of breast cancer during the twentieth century. Eur J Cancer 35:1963–1973, 1999.
- Fisher B: Biological research in the evolution of cancer surgery: A personal perspective. Cancer Res 68:10007–10020, 2008.
- McGuire WL, Donegan WL, Fisher B, et al: Optimal surgical approaches to the local management of early breast cancer (a panel discussion). Breast Cancer Res Treat 6:101–112, 1985.
- Fisher B, Wolmark N: Conservative surgery: The American experience. Semin Oncol 13:425–433, 1986.
- Fisher B. Experiences in the evolution, technique, and results of breast conservation for the treatment of mammary cancer. HH Bohmert, HP Leis, and IT Jackson. Breast Cancer: Conservative and Reconstructive Surgery. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers, 1989. p.40–57.
- Fisher B, Anderson S, Fisher ER, et al: Significance of ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence after lumpectomy. Lancet 338:327–331, 1991.
- Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al: Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 312:665–673, 1985.
- Fisher B, Redmond C, Fisher ER, et al: The contribution of recent NSABP clinical trials of primary breast cancer therapy to an understanding of tumor biology: An overview of findings. Cancer 46:1009–1025, 1980.
- Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241, 2002.
- Anderson SJ, Wapnir I, Dignam JJ, et al: Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in patients treated by breast-conserving therapy in five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocols of node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:2466–2473, 2009.
- Wapnir IL, Anderson SJ, Mamounas EP, et al: Prognosis after ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and locoregional recurrences in five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project node-positive adjuvant breast cancer trials. J Clin Oncol 24:2028–2037, 2006.
- Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Favourable and unfavourable effects on long-term survival of radiotherapy for early breast cancer: An overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 355:1757–1770, 2000
- Overgaard M, Nielsen HM, Overgaard J: Is the benefit of postmastectomy irradiation limited to patients with four or more positive nodes, as recommended in international consensus reports? A subgroup analysis of the DBCG 82 b&c randomized trials. Radiother Oncol 82:247–253, 2007.
Bernard Fisher, Stewart J. Anderson
From the Departments of Surgery and Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Corresponding author: Bernard Fisher, MD, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Forbes Tower, Ste 7098, 200 Lothrop St, Pittsburgh PA 15213; e-mail: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).